Author: Administrator

  • Anas drops snippets of Coronavirus exposé, full video airs Monday

    Anas drops snippets of Coronavirus exposé, full video airs Monday

    Investigative journalist, Anas Aremeyaw Anas is back from the shadows, this time with an exposé about the deadly and fast-spreading Coronavirus.

    His investigative piece is expected to bring to light the corrupt dealings regarding the pandemic and how certain individuals are making money off the coronavirus with the excuse of selling potent cures.

    In announcing the documentary, Anas in a post on Facebook said, “Are you ready? It’s coming, the corona quacks and thieves in Ghana. It would be served hot on BBC Africa Eye. All major stations in Ghana.”

    In a tweet by BBC Africa, the media outlet revealed that the exposé, themed: Corona Quacks is a joint operation with Anas.

    “Uncovering a Covid-19 scam worth tens of thousands of dollars. An investigation by @anasaremeyawanas and BBC Africa Eye,” the tweet read.

    Additionally, they noted that the investigative piece will be aired on Monday, June 29, 2020.

    A scene from the investigative piece by Anas Aremeyaw Anas below

    YouTube player

    Source: www.ghanaweb.com

  • The Supreme Court’s decision was lost in interpretation

    The Supreme Court’s decision was lost in interpretation

    After eating my fufu and peanut butter soup which I prepared all by myself, I went to lay on my bed here in Austin and started dreaming that seven cows were chasing me. I immediately started flying in the clouds and began wondering when I evolved into an angel. At that very moment, a loud ring on my phone brought me down to earth.

    My friend and classmate from Ghana announced to me that the Supreme Court of Ghana had given a split decision ordering the Electoral Commission to go ahead and compile the voter’s register while at the same time directing the Commission to use the Voter I.D. Card for the compilation of the register.

    In support of this claim, there was this meme he posted to me in which the General Secretary of the NDC was explaining the meaning of the ruling in a stentorian voice whereas all these big NDC lawyers were nodding their heads in agreement. There was another video clip in which Lawyer Xavier Sosu had written authoritatively stating that the Court’s decision was itself enough grounds to conclude that the registration could not proceed, and advising the EC to abandon the exercise altogether. Besides, I also heard a number of radio stations announcing the same interpretation of the Court’s ruling.

    Thus, I was disposed to believe these accounts without reading the ruling itself because it accorded with my own state of mind and reasoning; for long before the ruling, I had also predicted in an article that the Supreme Court would allow the EC to undertake the registration exercise while permitting the use of the Voter ID Card.

    I wrote the following on my Group Platform without bothering to search for the actual text of the ruling:

    1. The Voter Register will proceed as scheduled. 2. The Voter ID Card would be included as a form of identification. 3. The relevant constitutional instrument will be amended to include the Voter ID Card as a form of identification.

    I made all these statements without referring to the ruling itself, taking for granted that I was not better than those who were speaking so profusely in public about it…..Until some other classmates began to make statements that were contrary to the prevailing interpretation. Some references were made of some legal interpretation being proffered by some lawyers on the Asempa Radio. These were arguing that the Voter ID Card had been disallowed in the ruling. They presented the ruling itself as evidence that the Court had rejected all the reliefs sought by the NDC. I read the ruling they offered thrice before I got its full implication. Thereafter, I had to apologize for getting it all wrong.

    The point of all the foregoing is to establish that the Court’s ruling was rather vague and ambiguous: If the Court divides the issues, it must clearly take care to rule on every issue either granting or denying it. The court cannot grant a relief which it has amended and to which it has attached an unrequested condition. Only the litigant can amend its relief. If the condition invalidates the grant, then the relief is denied. Period! The NDC did not request for any relief subject to C.I. 126; so why grant any such relief?

    To wit, if a I go to court asking for you to debar my adversary from entering my dwellings, you cannot say, “I grant your request, subject to his right to use your toilet”. That amounts to a grant and a denial of the grant which can lead to a lot of confusion.

    In the matter at hand, the Supreme Court granted the NDC its relief all right but took that grant away by subjecting it to C.I. 126. That created the confusion. What was the purpose of that grant if it was to be subjected to a condition against which the party had filed a suit? The Supreme Court could have done better by simply denying all the NDC reliefs.

    That confusion was what led to Asiedu Nketia’s muzzled interpretation; he was genuinely misled by the convolution of the Supreme Court and could hardly be blamed where seasoned lawyers were found standing beside him and bobbing their heads like lizards in agreement.

    Even if the respected General was freely winging the narrative, it would have been his right to do so because it is usual for both plaintiffs and defendants to claim victory as a strategy to save face…….And even sometimes to save chaos. Because given the tension surrounding this lawsuit, it is possible to imagine a rioting if the matter had sunk in suddenly that the NDC had lost. The little time given by Asiedu Nketia’s faulty construction might have saved lives: Gradually, as the truth trickled in, people had the capacity to contain their disappointment and euphoria. For all you know, only a mosquito can bite so slowly and gradually to avoid a raucous!

    And as to the verdict itself, the Supreme Court pulled off a sleight of hand that saved the country from further litigations and lawsuits. When people choose to condemn the Court for its decisions, they ought to understand how a Supreme Court approaches its opinion. It has to be about maintaining peace and prudence and avoiding activism and preventing a headlong collision with the other branches of government. We must remember that the judiciary is the weakest branch of government because the executive has its law enforcement and the legislature has its masses but the Court has nothing except its pen and robe; so it must exercise its jurisdiction with prudence and tact and wisdom. If the judiciary discovers two paths of justice, it will proceed on the easier one for sure.

    We shouldn’t waste our time with the relief requesting the Supreme Court to stop the EC from compiling the register because that one is childish and foolish. The source of law that informed the seminal precedent in the Abu Ramadan case is called The Chevron Deference which presumes that every agency has the power to perform its function according to statutes. That presumption is almost impossible to overcome and appears to hold sway in Anglo-Saxon Common Law.

    Yet there was another relief that was grantable: That of expanding the method of identification to include the Voter ID Card and birth certificates. But the price for the grant might have appeared too expensive for the Court under the circumstances. It was obvious that such a grant would mean a direct challenge to the power of both parliament and executive. It would also have opened the floodgates of further litigation and confusion as already threatened by some sections of the population. One by one, others would have sued for the expansion of all forms of identifications, clogging the courts with all manner of frivolous lawsuits. The Court had the duty to cut the matter short. Here, nobody is going to Court again to seek any interpretation of the power of the EC to compile a register; and nobody can come out to express any doubts about what the Court means. The matter has ended!

    For in the end, everything was much ado about nothing really. The NDC could have negotiated to expand the list of acceptable identifications to be used in the registration simply by fully participating in the inter-party consultative process.

    Instead, it chose procession in the streets and threats and insults and litigation as its modus operandi. The result is the present defeat.

    But I even believe that in spite of the Supreme Court’s ruling, it should be possible for the party to negotiate on the side for an acceptable deal with the EC. That process of post judgment negotiations is called plea in remittitur and should be available under the law.

  • FULL SPEECH: Mahama’s address on the Supreme Court ruling on compilation of voters register

    Flagbearer of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), John Dramani Mahama, has expressed his disappointment with the Supreme Court ruling on the matter of the compilation of the new voters register by the Electoral Commission.

    At a press conference Thursday evening at the party’s headquarters, Mr Mahama noted “With or without a new voters register, the NDC shall win this election by the grace of God,” he said.

    He continued: “No politically engineered register can save this failed government from the inevitable defeat that awaits them in the next 165 days.”

    Read the full speech below:

    ADDRESS BY HE JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA, FLAGBEARER OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (NDC) ON THE SUPREME COURT RULING ON COMPILATION OF A NEW VOTER REGISTER

    Good evening my brother and sisters,

    Earlier today, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Ghana gave its ruling in a case brought by the National Democratic Congress against the Electoral Commission over its decision to compile a new voter register.

    Despite the well-reasoned reliefs we sought, the apex court of the land gave the leeway for the Electoral Commission to go ahead with the exclusion of the existing voter identification cards from the list of identification requirements.

    We are deeply disappointed and strongly disagree with the court over this outcome, which has confounded many legal experts and thrown the country into a state of confusion.

    Our legal team is examining this decision even as we await the full judgement.

    It is worrying that the Court deferred the reasons for its decisions to the 15th of July, by which time the EC would have been two weeks into the registration exercise.

    My brothers and sisters, throughout its history, the NDC has stood strongly for an inclusive democracy.

    That is because the party is built on the principle that no one should be left out in the governance process of our beloved country.

    This principle may be seen through the various programmes and projects upon which our democracy is built: the composition of the Consultative Assembly, which prepared the 1992 Constitution; the consultations for the review of the Constitution in 2010 (which stands out as the most comprehensive consultative programme in our history and the history of the sub-region); just to mention a few.

    The NPP tradition, on the other hand, has since the founding of our nation always stood for an exclusive governance structure.

    A structure, which seeks to leave out the ordinary men and women of our country.

    A structure, which rather favours only a select few who consider themselves the owners of the nation.

    To ensure this, the NPP has since its assumption of power in 2017, consistently put in place measures, which seek to systematically disenfranchise eligible citizens.

    Such measures include restricting the identification mechanism for voter registration to documents, which are not accessible to millions of eligible voters.

    We have been very clear in our minds that the decision to compile a new voters register was in pursuit of this long-held agenda, hence our efforts to stop the wholesale attempt to exclude vast sections of our population from the process to determine who leads them.

    This represents the handiwork of a desperate incumbent that on account of its very poor performance in government sees its political survival only through the prism of manipulation of the electoral process to exclude a section of Ghanaians who they suspect may not renew their mandate at the polls.

    A caring, compassionate and responsible government would not push us to this brink at a time of a major pandemic like COVID-19 that is causing so much anguish among the citizenry.

    It is deeply regrettable that the Electoral Commission, which should be independent, has made itself a willing tool in the execution of this most diabolic agenda.

    The exclusion of the old Voters ID card, which has been used to conduct several elections under the current leadership of the Electoral Commission and from which the current President derives his mandate is aimed at deliberately disenfranchising some Ghanaians who have falsely been branded foreigners without any basis.

    The restriction of primary identification to passports, Ghana Cards and the resort to guaranteeing for others is a ruse to create frustration in the hope that it will discourage millions from registering and in the process give advantage ab initio to a bungling incumbent.

    The Ghana Card, which has been made one of two identification documents has not been rolled out in full.

    As we speak, these cards are still being issued with no mechanism for verification.

    The National Identification Authority itself has admitted to duplication of thousands of these cards

    Therefore, the NDC’s decision to go to the Supreme Court, was informed by the party’s time-honoured belief and commitment to an inclusive democracy as opposed to the NPP’s exclusiveness.

    However, it was obvious from the outset of this struggle that inclusive democracy was not going to have a hearing, even against the resounding call by the National House of Chiefs, religious leaders, CSOs and the various trade and professional groups.

    My brothers and sisters, the right to vote must however not be curtailed on account of this minor setback for inclusion.

    We cannot throw our hands up in despair because the fight to insist on inclusion has been temporarily derailed by this ruling.

    We can still make our voices heard even if we must endure some inconvenience and frustration.

    To achieve the objective of taking part in the decision over who governs us, we must be willing to make the necessary sacrifices in the present circumstances.

    I therefore urge all Ghanaians of voting age to channel the disappointment at the effort to exclude them from the electoral process into an opportunity to have their voices heard and turn up to register in their teeming numbers, when the process begins next week Tuesday.

    The NPP and the EC are very much aware that the exclusion of the existing voter ID will significantly slow down the process of registration and create the real risk of people massing up outside the voting centers.

    But this is what happens when politics is put before the people.

    While at it, let us keep safe by adhering strictly to all COVID-19 preventive protocols, such as social distancing, the wearing of face masks among others, particularly because of the increasing trend in the number of infections and deaths recorded.

    I pray that the almighty God shall protect all our citizens who come out to exercise their constitutional right to register from any sickness or infection by any disease.

    The process may be made deliberately slow and painful, but I encourage you all to endure it in so far as it would enable you vote out this government that has masterminded that frustration in the first place.

    We must always be willing to hold leaders accountable for bad decisions that impose difficulties on citizens and this is one clear opportunity to do so. Do not let the several hours you may spend at the registration centre get you to surrender your right to vote.

    That would only embolden those who seek to disenfranchise you. To the few who have passports and Ghana cards, make use of them and register.

    To those who get the opportunity to register, I implore you to assist your brother, sister and compatriot by guaranteeing for them even if it takes a bit more of your time.

    See this as a civic duty and your contribution to the effort to preserve the right to vote.

    This way, we will undo the grand conspiracy to deprive us of the inalienable right to vote and we will in the process send a clear signal that it is only we the people who will decide who gets the opportunity to lead this country and not the governments we elect or state agencies who make themselves pliant accomplices in the attempt to disenfranchise us.

    This is not just an NDC fight, it is a fight to rescue the very soul of our beloved country from the hands of those who seek to impose their will unjustly on the people.

    Our forefathers founded this nation with the motto “Freedom and Justice”.

    It is clear today that never in the history of our 4th Republic have these two lofty ideals been in such short supply.

    I salute the all the diverse organizations, Civil Society Organizations, prominent chiefs, organized labor, professional groups and all well-meaning Ghanaians who have rallied around this cause to demand that the right thing be done in the larger national interest.

    I call on all Ghanaians who yearn to see a change in the governance of this country to rise up and be counted for where there is a will, there is a way.

    No politically engineered register can save this failed government from the inevitable defeat that awaits them in the next 165 days.

    With or without a new voters register, the NDC shall win this election by the grace of God.

    I leave you with this famous quote by Emperor Haile Selassie:

    “Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”

    I thank you for your kind attention

    <iframe src=”https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fradiogold905fm%2Fvideos%2F834153180446228%2F&show_text=0&width=560″ width=”560″ height=”315″ style=”border:none;overflow:hidden” scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ allowTransparency=”true” allowFullScreen=”true”></iframe>

  • Stranded Ghanaians Head Home From Newark Airport.

    Stranded Ghanaians Head Home From Newark Airport.

     

    The first batch of stranded Ghanaian evacuees from the United States left the Liberty International Airport in Newark for Accra today. The flight was arranged by the Consulate-General in New York and The Ghana Embassy in Washington DC for citizens of Ghana in the US who are registered with the Consulate-General and the Embassy.

    Two hundred and Eighty-Five Ghanaians were on board the maiden flight . The airfare for the flight was $1,350 and $2840 for Economy and Business classes respectively. Each passenger was allowed two pieces of luggage weighing 50lbs or 22 kilos.

    There was also a pre-boarding screening for COVID-19 of all evacuees before departure. All the passengers were required to provide their own Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the flight.The evacuees will be quarantined upon arrival in Accra for a mandatory 14 days with the possibility of an extension to 21 days.

    Earlier reports that indicated that the cost of their quarantine either at Kempinski Hotel (¢650) or the Africa Regent hotel (¢550) will be borne by the evacuees were confirmed. Some of the passengers interviewed confirmed that they had to show proof of payment for their quarantine to the authorities before they were allowed to leave. Majority of the passengers paid glowing tribute to the Government of Ghana and all those involved in the arrangement to get them back home.Ghanaian officials in the US intimated that there may be more flights in the offing.

    Source: Bedzra Dzokoto

  • Full Judgment on the NDC versus EC case

    Full Judgment on the NDC versus EC case

    Two reliefs  being sort  by the NDC and were upheld by the court are:
     
     
    2. A declaration that upon a true and proper. interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution, specifically article 51 read conjointly with article 42 of the Constitution, the power of the 2nd Defendant to compile and review the voters’ register must be exercised subject to respect for and the protect-kin of the right to vote;
    3. A declaration that, upon a true and proper interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution, particularly article 42, upon the registration of and issuance of a voter identification card to a person, that person has an accrued right to vote which cannot be divested in an arbitrary and capricious manner;
     
    Meaning: The ruling is clear, the old voter ID to be allowed and the court granted it . That is the voter must be present with the ID at the registration center…sankofaonline.com

    The National Democratic Congress in May, 2020 sued the Electoral Commission at the Supreme Court over its decision to compile a new voters register ahead of the 2020 elections.

    The opposition party stated their stance against the EC’s decision stating that the exercise was unnecessary and costly. The EC being adamant, indicated its resolve to proceed with its decision.

    Following this, the NDC sought an order from the court to stop the EC from compiling a new voters register and an alternative order declaring as illegal the decision of the electoral body not to consider the old voter ID cards as a proof of citizenship for registering.

    But the Apex court gave them a directive to make a choice on which of their two reliefs they wanted a decision on.

    It is for this reason the NDC dropped the case which questions the power of the Electoral Commission to compile a new register.

    The Supreme Court in a unanimous decision merged the two cases against the EC’s voters registration exercise.

    A private citizen Mark Takyi-Banso was also seeking same relief as the NDC.

    Two reliefs out of the 8 reliefs were granted to the NDC by the Apex court. These are the reliefs two and three.

    Source: ghanaweb.com