Renowned Ghanaian lawyer Tsatsu Tsikata has expressed concerns over the Supreme Court’s recent decision on Speaker Alban Bagbin’s declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant. Mr. Tsikata questioned the court’s justification for dismissing Bagbin’s application, specifically the assertion that the High Court should handle parliamentary seat vacancies. He argued that this contradicts Article 99 of Ghana’s 1992 Constitution, which states that the responsibility lies with the Speaker.
The Supreme Court’s ruling has sparked debate about the Speaker’s interpretation of the Constitution and his authority to unilaterally declare seats vacant. The case, brought by Alexander Afenyo-Markin, leader of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) parliamentary caucus, challenges Bagbin’s declaration.
Tsikata’s criticism highlights the complexities surrounding parliamentary procedures and the balance of power between the Speaker and the judiciary. The impending judgment on November 12, 2024, is expected to have significant implications for Ghana’s parliamentary landscape.
Ruth Abla ADJORLOLO
