In a recent court testimony, Richard Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing ambulance case, revealed that the ambulances shipped to Ghana were under warranty and not meant for immediate use. This statement was made during his cross-examination on Thursday, June 13, 2024.
Jakpa clarified that the ambulances were part of a consignment bound by a comprehensive warranty agreement, which required the vehicles to undergo detailed inspections and necessary adjustments prior to their deployment. The warranty conditions were designed to ensure that the ambulances adhered to all operational standards and safety requirements.
The warranty agreement and its stipulations were reportedly communicated to the relevant Ghanaian authorities, who were tasked with the inspection and commissioning of the ambulances. Jakpa emphasized that the instructions were explicit: the ambulances should remain unused until the mandated procedures were completed, a protocol standard for such deliveries to guarantee functionality and safety.
Addressing concerns about the ambulances’ condition upon arrival, Jakpa stated that any premature use would have breached the warranty terms, potentially affecting their performance. He underscored the importance of following the warranty guidelines to maintain the ambulances’ integrity and reliability. The testimony sheds light on the procedural nuances that have contributed to the delay in the ambulances’ deployment, raising questions about the readiness of such critical healthcare infrastructure.
Source: sankofaonline.com
