By: Joycelyn Amarteifio, Accra.
The political landscape in Ghana is witnessing a paradox that exposes the selective outrage of certain members of the New Patriotic Party (NPP). On one hand, they vehemently oppose the suspension of Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo, framing it as an attempt by President John Dramani Mahama’s administration to capture the judiciary. On the other, they dismiss serious allegations against their own party figures—such as Chairman Wontumi, who faces grave charges including money laundering—as politically motivated attacks.
For years, Ghanaians have demanded accountability for nation wreckers and corrupt officials who have plundered public resources with impunity for their own benefits. The electorate voted for change, rejecting the complacency of past administrations in favor of a government that would hold wrongdoers accountable. President Mahama and his team are simply fulfilling that mandate.
It is, therefore, absurd for certain NPP members—some of whom hold parliamentary positions—to attempt to frame legitimate legal actions as political persecution. Even within their own ranks, voices are emerging, calling for justice and the retrieval of stolen funds. This shift suggests that the public’s demand for accountability is resonating beyond party lines.
The coalition’s petition to Ambassador Maher Kheir raises valid concerns about judicial independence, but it must be examined in the broader context of Ghana’s evolving political climate. If the judiciary is truly being reshaped for partisan gain, that is a serious issue. However, the same scrutiny must be applied to those who cry foul only when it suits their interests while turning a blind eye to corruption within their own circles.
Ultimately, Ghana’s democracy hinges on the impartial application of justice. If the coalition genuinely seeks to protect judicial integrity, it must also support efforts to prosecute corruption, regardless of political affiliation. Selective outrage does little to strengthen democratic institutions—it only exposes hypocrisy.
