The African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) has sounded the alarm over the ongoing vetting process for ministerial nominees, describing it as unsatisfactory. According to Dr. Rasheed Draman, Executive Director of ACEPA, the conduct of members from both sides of Parliament has hindered the process, preventing a thorough interrogation of nominees on critical national issues.
Dr. Draman expressed concerns that members of Parliament, particularly those from the Minority, are missing opportunities to hold nominees accountable. Instead of focusing on trivial issues, they should be scrutinizing nominees’ competence, integrity, and fit for their designated roles. On the other hand, members of the Majority are treating the vetting process like a “friendly match,” rather than taking it seriously.
ACEPA is calling for a reassessment of the Appointments Committee’s approach to ensure the vetting process serves its intended purpose. Dr. Draman emphasized the need to revisit the operational framework of the Appointments Committee to enhance its effectiveness. The current approach, he argues, does not allow for rigorous examination of nominees on pressing national matters.
This criticism comes amid public outcry over the vetting process, with many observers urging Parliament to prioritize substance over partisan interests. As the vetting process continues, ACEPA’s concerns serve as a reminder of the need for a more rigorous and effective approach to ensuring that ministerial nominees are truly fit for office.
CNR/Ruth Abla ADJORLOLO
